HomeОбразованиеRelated VideosMore From: High Frequency Radio

HOW TO SIGN YOUR SIGNATURE WITHOUT LIABILITY

5078 ratings | 221333 views
Please watch: "THE US BANKRUPTCY AND THE TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT (SOVEREIGN CITIZENS)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCvNDAW0afw --~-- Audio Book- Cracking the Code Chapter 10 (3rd Edition) http://www.welcometothefoundation.com/documents/CRACKING%20THE%20CODE%203RD%20EDITION.pdf SPC University: http://spcuniversity.privatesidesolutions.com EMAIL LIST: https://tinyurl.com/y7ye7dys DONATION HERE: https://paypal.me/yusefel
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (898)
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
I mispronounced largesse. I know how to pronounce the word. Your comment is just going to get deleted a blocked.
ginger bread (4 days ago)
Lindeman . its your own fault for comming off like a know it all howwver, being to damned ignorant to keep it easy for the layman. next thing ya know you will have something to sell. you PRINCE HALL BASTARDS ARE THE SAME, and were gonna kill all of you for selling crack to our white children.
Nat Simms (5 days ago)
High Frequency Radio good morning
Lindeman (8 days ago)
People are so pretty lol.
Jason A (12 days ago)
could you have been any more ambiguous about how to sign. your legalese is to confusing why couldn't you clearly somerize how to sign, I more confused then ever on what you claim is the way someone should sign, how do you think this is helpful, you made it clear as mud how to sign thanks for wasting my time
watchtheirhands (8 hours ago)
While there is no question we are unknowingly enslaved in their monetary system, I believe the more pressing issue is the transgender agenda that is steamrolling towards us. Check out "Transpocalypse Now" channel.
IAM MAN (1 day ago)
Did this in Family court, judge doesn't want to talk to me
Maria Aldrete (2 days ago)
You know those machines that accept change to get paper money(coin-op).......well....now I understand why it has to catch up while processing your receipt.......I just had that experience..... I literally said to myself.....hang on I need to catch up!!!!!!!lol. Great video....I just need to catch up now.....thank you sweetheart I love learning what you know!!!!!!maria
Kathleen Ann (2 days ago)
@19:40, the narrator says while reading, "...We can't help it if they are too stupid to know that they are NOT the authorized representative..." Please note he meant, "...to know that they ARE the authorized representative..." There is no "NOT" in the text.
Tony CudA (3 days ago)
Thanks for taking the time to make this video
Hick Billy (3 days ago)
Ever tried this in court? I have. It took 5 yrs of fighting over a speeding ticket because the court did not want to fold even though they knew i won.
Brian Levesque (5 days ago)
You made the mistake at the 19:52 mark when you said the word "not" the authorized representative. You should have not said the word "not". It Is printed correctly though in the video. This is a great video. Thank you.
Tony CudA (3 days ago)
Brian good job. I like it whenever someone voices their opinion about what they find the video is lacking instead of giving a thumbs-down wish YouTube had more people with that type of integrity peace love flower power tie dye and deeds
We the People are bring down the BANKS and taking our country back. HOW YOU SAY? By paying off debts and loans with PROMISSORY NOTES. Learn this do this and teach others. To brake the chains.
George G (5 days ago)
What do you mean, how to do it?
Grace Joubarne (7 days ago)
Hello from Canada...have tried your email address to find out if your materials apply in Canada. UCC does not apply in Canada, but the Bills of Exchange Act does. Please advise and thank you for all your dedication.
Charles Ivie (10 hours ago)
Have helped many Canadians also. Conservative, love debt, anti-authorities, taxes, monarchs!
Grace Joubarne (5 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio I should note that since Canada was never federated, every province is sovereign and therefore every province has a PPSA. The link you sent was for BC, but there is one for Ontario as well.
High Frequency Radio (6 days ago)
It is not called the UCC in Canada. https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/canadian-ma-perspectives/you-say-ucc-we-say-ppsa "U.S. counsel will be familiar with Article 9 of the UCC, but what about its Canadian equivalent? The good news here is that the Canadian equivalent of the UCC in common law provinces and territories, the Personal Property Security Act (or more commonly referred to as the “PPSA”), need not be a source of intimidation to U.S. counsel and business people in the context of a cross-border M&A deal. This is because the UCC and the PPSA are old friends, with the PPSA being based (at least loosely anyway) on the UCC and because there is a separate, yet comparable PPSA in each of the Canadian common law provinces and territories, the PPSA is not unlike the regime provided for by the UCC." THE LAW MERCHANT IS ALL OF THE WORLD. IF YOU THINK IT DOES NOT APPLY IN YOUR COUNTRY IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT THEY CALL IT IN YOUR COUNTRY.
Incognito Express (8 days ago)
I have tried to contact you through your email address SPC University. I’m trying this way now but I will also be trying your PO Box
Charles Ivie (10 hours ago)
Am under-attack. Email, call, text etc. For as long as lasts!
Charles Ivie (9 days ago)
That's it!
Charles Ivie (2 days ago)
I know how everything runs and works$!
James Schwandt (12 days ago)
as the hours of filtering info goes on, saying I am thankful to have found you just doesn't get it. Guidance is whats needed. I can research . Direction with honesty, is an understatement. 1? can a passport be obtained with a possible charge pending
ervin mars (13 days ago)
https://open.spotify.com/track/38xh0iuhkYiymc1cm3HhD1?si=kBgA3rJvRhmsYajzjAIQ8Q
axe2grind911a (13 days ago)
This is pure BS, since the micro printing of the words "authorized signature" are NOT legible or known by the signer. In any court (if it was ever to be brought to court!) this would not hold up since it is unknown to the signer and therefore fraudulent. A person cannot be held liable to something outside of their intent or their knowledge by reasonable means. That would be no different than signing in invisible or slowly disappearing ink! Actually, in the latter case, you could potentially claim that you never signed (and risk fraud yourself!) but you might get away with it without witnesses or notary.
axe2grind911a (13 hours ago)
@Parrotshootist Really? I've only been using the internet since 1995 and so obviously had no idea what all caps meant... I thought I was merely creating a fictitious entity... My apologies... BTW, it's a little rude to be talking about applying anything into your grandmother... Nice way to avoid addressing the issue.
Parrotshootist (18 hours ago)
+axe2grind911a You realise that the implied shouting in net speak, being all caps, is not the same as it applies in gramma, and the gramma of those documents is, I believe, considered to be highly important, is it not?
axe2grind911a (12 hours ago)
You don't state your "NAME" in caps in court. You verbally state it, and sometimes are asked to spell it for the record. You are not forced to say: "Capital J, capital O, capital H, capital N" etc. if your name is John Doe. Also, if you get a court transcript, your name is NOT in caps in the documents. At least none I have seen, and I've seen many, having been involved in numerous lawsuits (as plaintiff). Also, my birth certificate has my name in regular print, like: 'John Doe', not "JOHN DOE". So, this is just a lot of nonsense that people are constructing about all caps. It does not matter. Banks started using all caps in the early days of mainframe computers, since it was easier for computers to read and print in those days. It had nothing to do with "new identities" and everything to do with card readers and punch cards. It was easier for the people manually punching in the punch cards to have an abbreviated alphabet which eliminated some of the human error in data entry. Plus, the cards were limited to a 48 character data set (BCDIC) - not enough to include lower case! This became the standard and many banks stuck with this for decades, even after the computer alphabet changed from BCDIC to EBCDIC and eventually to ASCII in the PC era. My bank currently has all correspondence with me - both online and in mailed statements - in a mix of upper and lower case. So where is the "false" upper case me? I challenge anyone to show where a court distinguished all cap names from mixed case names, EXCEPT in documents which establish shorthands to be used within the document. But guess what? It always states something like this: John Doe, herein referred to as "DOE", or more usually, they refer to people as simply "Plaintiff" and "Defendant" (may or may not be capitalized.) The point is that, even when all caps are used - it ONLY applies to the context within the document with an establishing statement such as "herein referred to as:" or it may even eliminate that and say it like this: John Doe ("Doe"). Note it does not have to be capitalized. But it should be consistent within the document. IT DOES NOT CARRY FORWARD OUTSIDE THE DOCUMENT!
CHRIS.D.EM. (1 day ago)
axe2grind911a Then how come they don't hear or acknowledge u in court until u state yr NAME when asked and only in a specific way when asked? Also a company created doesn't have a flesh & blood counterpart to duplicate . It is its own stand alone legal entity created by 'you'. Whereas they are duplicating something they didn't create but are using to lien on for their own ends In exchange for meagre scraps in return in the form of 'Benefits' & 'privileges'..
axe2grind911a (1 day ago)
Answer: the YOU (same as "you") is the person standing in court. I get that you guys believe that capitalization is some sort of demonic etheric double, but it is NOT true. Corporations do NOT have to be created in capital letters (mine was not), and are not "duplicated" when referred to in caps. Hint: read any corporate founding docs - most are not in capital letters. It is merely a "convention" that in legal documents, caps often (but not always) are used to refer to defined entities (or things) as a form of shorthand. But there is no magic about it.
Vegashane (17 days ago)
Would a job application be smart to put this on? Like type it in on the electronic signature?
Casey Graham (16 days ago)
Thats y im here. Im writin exempt on my w4
David Billings (18 days ago)
Don't show up to their court and they will issue a bench warrant. They will get you regardless of what you do. They cannot let the system fail.
Chris V (19 days ago)
I signed a contract using the method in the video in a agreement with a college to get enrolled, they told me that they cannot accept the contract/agreement with that form of signature and I cannot be enrolled unless I sign it with just my signature. I told them I have the right to sign it in this manner and they responded saying they have a right not to accept the agreement with that form of signature. Is this true can they refuse?
IAM MAN (1 day ago)
The Rhins Ranger see examples at 16:02,
The Rhins Ranger (9 days ago)
High Frequency Radio - I’m sorry, I’m confused as there’s too many people saying this and that, can you type me out an example of how I should sign in a forced situation. Please tag my name in the reply or I won’t see it. Many thanks.
High Frequency Radio (19 days ago)
Absolutely true. They have a right not to do business with you. You have to decide if you want to do business with someone who forces you to abide by their terms.
Sonia Alvarez-Serrano (20 days ago)
This is the wisdom I was looking for Thank you God the Creator of the heavens and earth for enlighten Ed this man's mind to share with all are willing to receive. Amén
Poison Ivy (22 days ago)
Fed Reserve owns the USA. Our Govt filed BK in 1933, the Fed Res bought us. Our Govt became a Corporation. States are Franchises. Judges (etc) are Administrators. This is why they steal our tax dollars, no one can be held accountable. Under the Terms, the Pres (or should I say “CEO”) must issue an Emergency every year. As long as the Public favor is good, things continue. When it’s not, we become “The Enemy of the State”. We are there now. Things are going to get a lot worse Sources: 1973 Senate Report 93549 1993, Mr Traficant got it on the Record. STOPTHECRIME- NASA WAR PLANS, 5G Silent Killer, tidal waves, fires, Earthquakes, radiation bursts, Fry microwave lasers, blow up things, Trojan Horse Everything. “They” are going to eliminate a lot of us (95%). They cause 90% of nat disasters at this point, it’s documented. Aren’t even hiding it. New Orleans is a RESILIENT CITY. What does that mean? They used it as a Test/Pilot. They threw every disaster they could at it. Now it’s a police state. Ever see Minority Report? That’s N.O. They have infrared cameras all over town. Facial Recognition that can predict someone will do a crime BEFOREHAND and arrest them. Don’t believe it? Google it or look up resilient city. There will be “33” (of course). Also look up “Trump goes to Saudi Arabia & puts hands on crystal ball”. They are trying to mimic prophecy by creating things to happen as it says in last days. Even “The Red Heifer” - Science achieved that. Maybe they think People will commit suicide? Most Christians are passive, turn to the Bible and accept anything.
Charles Ivie (7 days ago)
you got it! my dad was "poison " ivie professional basketball player. only one to ever beat the globe-trotting clowns! traficanti is mafia! so, all self-Unregulated. just stand-up when they come for you! don't pay anything, and go to trial!
Kissma Kate (24 days ago)
Fab thank you
KingdomCome (24 days ago)
Will this work for Canada, they don't follow the UCC?
Grace Joubarne (5 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio Sorry to bother you and thank you for the clarification.
Grace Joubarne (5 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio Thank you so much...helps to clarify. I was at the law library and they looked at me as though I had two heads. I also see that Canada is a signatory to the UNIDROIT, and I had previously learned about the Bills of Exchange Act and the PPSA, but could not put it together solidly enough to feel confident that the 3 together were the equivalent of your UCC.
High Frequency Radio (6 days ago)
+Grace Joubarne THIS SHOULD KILL THE CONVERSATION FOR YOU. https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/canadian-ma-perspectives/you-say-ucc-we-say-ppsa "U.S. counsel will be familiar with Article 9 of the UCC, but what about its Canadian equivalent? The good news here is that the Canadian equivalent of the UCC in common law provinces and territories, the Personal Property Security Act (or more commonly referred to as the “PPSA”), need not be a source of intimidation to U.S. counsel and business people in the context of a cross-border M&A deal. This is because the UCC and the PPSA are old friends, with the PPSA being based (at least loosely anyway) on the UCC and because there is a separate, yet comparable PPSA in each of the Canadian common law provinces and territories, the PPSA is not unlike the regime provided for by the UCC." Now all you have to do is go to the Law Library and pull this book off the shelf and you will find all the court decisions to your heart's delight. YOU CAN'T FIND IT BECAUSE IT IS NOT CALLED THE UCC IN YOUR COUNTRY.
High Frequency Radio (6 days ago)
+Grace Joubarne - PLEASE DON'T MAKE ME KEEP GOING. I DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR THIS. YOU NEED TO GO TO THE LAW LIBRARY AND GET OFF THE COMPUTER.
High Frequency Radio (6 days ago)
+Grace Joubarne - IN TEXAS (MY HOME STATE) IT IS NOT CALLED THE UCC.. IT IS CALLED THE BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE. https://law.justia.com/codes/texas/2015/business-and-commerce-code/title-1/
Jack (24 days ago)
when i was a kid you would always try to be the banker because you had access to the notes and could steal the game .Is this just me or did other kids do this?
yes men ist the best
Tiffany Covell-Harris (24 days ago)
Great info
Shakir Rashada (25 days ago)
Interesting because after I listened to this broadcast, on dec 7th i was pulled over and issued a summons for allegedly speeding. I signed in the not guilty section of the summons, by signature and then Auth. Rep. Next to the signature and requested a supporting deposition. I mailed the document to the court. I went to the court and I went to the court 2 weeks later, the clerk told me that the info has not Bee uploaded into the system, the she so helpfully informed me that if I didn't receive a court date in 90 days the case would be dismissed then she said the clock has started? Oh really? well let's just say, if I don't receive my supporting deposition by the 7th of January I will be filing a motion to dismiss anyway, but I truly believe that by me signing that ticket how you suggested, gave that court a heads up, that they likely did not want me there due to what I might know?
Charles Ivie (6 days ago)
The "hole-thing"(sic)(k) has been illegal from the beginning! Hence all the phony-cowards that hide their names and identities while they surrveil. Almost-over!won't last-long! Nothing with no integrity, ethics, or morality ever-does!
Lindeman (8 days ago)
They definitely don't like the knowledgeable ones. Look into notice and demand as opposed to the motion which typically grant jurisdiction.
kerrmann (9 days ago)
Sure
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
Happens to me all the time!
lauren donahue (26 days ago)
So we would write authorized rep by a signature, to give up liability...but that is what it says under our personal checks already..why? I'm more confused.
The Rhins Ranger (9 days ago)
Yeah that’s why I’m confused
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
You are affirming that you are the "Authorized Signitor"
Tim Bordonaro (23 days ago)
Agreed
Mochab001 (27 days ago)
?
J130 G810 (27 days ago)
For a contract to be lawful there must equal means of exchange , both party's signing in wet ink and NO small print, people also need to research "Legal & Lawful" ...two completely different things
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
Yes, must be the "meeting of the minds" and "consideration. Nothing is legal, or lawful!
fragrantlilys X (1 month ago)
CONTROLLING THE LIVING & THE #DEAD ... escape the Mundi Prison with #virtues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caNZwk6sekE #mundi https://youtu.be/tEfsb7LuLNA
Kalla Susort (1 month ago)
Thank you!
C Evan (1 month ago)
Wow! You have missed the ENTIRE point of, well, everything. It starts by you claiming that “we had a gold backed currency”. Really? Who is this “we”? You had something to do with a now defunct banking system from over 100 years ago? Secondly, you people all focus on the wrong thing. UCC 3-402 is how to claim AGENCY with your signature. UCC 1-308 simply gives notice of a reservation of rights....as in the rights and defenses to a Negotiable Instrument. The fact that you signed anything grants you certain rights and defenses with or without a reservation of rights. It’s when you haven’t signed something that you’d want to reserve your rights. But my oh my......you e got the ENTIRE picture wrong.
C Evan (26 days ago)
Let’s start with my first question. Who is the “we” that you claim had a gold backed system and when was this?
C Evan (26 days ago)
No, I simply can’t stand you whack jobs who can’t read, don’t understand, yet preach to others.
The Rhins Ranger (28 days ago)
High Frequency Radio - ok you guys arguing has me confused now. How should I sign bills etc (as long as I’ve hurt no one) so I am not liable to pay etc?
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
As far as the gold is concerned, THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT. You have a comprehension problem as well as a self righteous attitude.
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
Wow..I can't believe how your lack of attention is so prominately displayed in a public forum: 7:45 . NO, you got it right wrong. Agency status is nothing new. This video talks about signing your name. You can sign however you want as long as it is unambiguous and cogent. This is a reading from cracking the code. Your inability to pay attention to that fact speaks volumes of your attention to detail and doubt you even watched the entire video. What you are saying is nothing new and there are other videos on this channel which speak of agency status. I brought it out to my listeners attention about 4 years ago.
Aaron Maughan (1 month ago)
This is how you sign once you've filed your ucc-1 and related documents needed to lay claim to your strawman. You never again want to confuse your strawman for your physical self.
C Evan (1 month ago)
Aaron Maughan really? I use it all the time. Why couldn’t I? I liened the fuck out of it! It’s now mine.
T C (1 month ago)
Read the rules in the 'Monology' game. ..this is mandatory reading for my 11year old son...as he is the 'banker'...in our sessions. I'm thoroughly pleased with your presentation of this subject matter.
Talisman (10 days ago)
T C Read Section 10 from “Cracking The Code” and UCC 3 - “NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS”; specifically, Part 4 - “LIABILITY OF PARTIES”, which should be “required reading” if an adult over 18 years is to participate in the commercial “game” of LIFE!
CipherBytes (1 month ago)
When I was in the military I was "persuaded" to sign documents all the time. I quickly learned how to sign "Compelled" as a signature. Not many people actually try to read a signature. They just look for the scribble to ensure it exists. Fortunately nothing ever came back on me to need the defense, but.....
Catherine O'Connell (1 month ago)
When working on the post >>> Indians signed with X for their registered post...........just an X will service............X means you have crossed yourself off......
Helen N (13 days ago)
It should also be assumed the indorser wasn't properly informed or capable of being informed.
CHRIS.D.EM. (1 month ago)
This is why paper cheques arnt used anymore..Notice how yr bank card has yr 'TRADE NAME' RAISED from the card and YR 'Authorised Signature' on the back of it is NOT. It's just words written in pen by 'You'... NOT Raised...NOT Recognised.. And that's because from THEIR point of view... 'You'.. EXIST to Them, as much as yr 'TRADE NAME'..EXISTS to 'You'.!.. The system is a Reflection of itself..And that reflection ... Is 'You'.. Cos when 'You' look in the mirror, WOT do u see....? U see the 'Creator'. And that Creator .... Is 'You' . Manifesting YR experience of the creation from the ONLY point that exists for ALL of us.... & That point is... 'NOW'. 🙏❤️😎👍x
James Schwandt (3 days ago)
Great insight to a perspective that many are seeking to find. Yet can not seem to hold on to once they have.
Nicks TaxFree (1 month ago)
After reading most of these comments, I want to remind people that this is about qualifying and protecting your Signature on what can be called "Adhesion Contracts" with Government agencies and quasi government agencies like banks and other financial institutions. Wherever your name is spelled in all upper case letters, this information is very valuable to protect yourself. They use this Strawman technique because they don't have real Jurisdiction over you unless they can deceive you into giving it to them. The best example is at the Motor Vehicle Department. You were born with a God given right to travel, recognized by the Courts throughout all the American states. The only law you are subject to is the common law in this regard. Without an injured party (corpus delecti) there is no violation of any law. Would you bother to go get a drivers license if the MVD told you that by signing the application for a license you are converting your right into a privilege which can subject you to all and any statute there corporate regulators can dream up to charge you with. So who is deceiving who?? This is nothing but slavery by other means. Sounds like some people want to remain on the plantation. Good luck with that. Courts always ask the DEFENDANT to raise and state your NAME. Or are you JOHN DOE? If you do either you will "adhere" your John Doe name to the written NAME on their paperwork. You are not that PERSON on Court or the drivers license, that's a legal fiction. You are a flesh and blood man or woman made in Gods image. So, at least qualify your signature on the Application next time and point it out to them if they don't see it. See what they do! Your just the non-liable authorized representative for a legal fiction who could possibly drive anyhow. If in court, ask them to spelling it and then show you their paperwork, so you could say No your honor, that ain't me. Government Corporations can only do business with and control other corporations that they created.
Jay Sagatti (1 month ago)
Nicks TaxFree How does this affect practical real world applications , ie: everyday commerce?
The Street (1 month ago)
I once used a ucc code above my name on a court order and the motion was dropped, I can’t remember the code, but basically it was meant to say under duress, as I was told if I didn’t sign I would be stripped naked beat down and thrown into a holding cell in solitary. Anybody know how to sign a court document under duress? I thought it was ucc 101-2 but could be mistaken
Jason A (12 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio why didn't you just say that in the first place instead of giving what looks like random answers to the rest of us sane people. after watch your video, I still have no idea how i'm supossed to sign, because your statement are clear as mud. why cant you just clearly explain in normal english at the end of the video how you should sign! your not helping anyone with this type of behaviour. I'm more confused now after watching your video then before, great job of explaining....NOT!!!!!
refusalxx1 (18 days ago)
The Street UCC 1-308
James Cox (1 month ago)
+High Frequency Radiopeace fam n thank you for this valuable info and your efforts, forgive me if you've covered this but I'm new to this. Does under duress have to be written in Latin or can it be in pain English?
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
+JULI TAIT - It means " You have forced me to do..."
The Street (1 month ago)
JULI TAIT thank
Ian Forgie (1 month ago)
by:
Janine Garverick (1 month ago)
We are property of The Corporations
Charles Ivie (3 days ago)
all bought and sold like whore before your "ant"cestors (sic)(k) were born. as irresposible, drugged-up, dumbed-down as today destroying the planet in short order. I call it crapitalism,! remeber everything is monitored by AI(anti-intelligence). still looking for signs of intelligence in the universe. fixin' to go on your watch(preppers, militarists, cachers, hoarders, billionaires first)! I call it the uass , as all emaiils, websites like 2facetruth.con destroyed for free-speech. that's why it's #1, guns 2. protect each other. great luck!
Bray Bulahan (3 days ago)
That's why America is called the United States, Inc.
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
If you surrender!
Janine Garverick (1 month ago)
Straw man Signature
Janine Garverick (1 month ago)
It’s just Debt !
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
Not my debt, never consented!
Nicks TaxFree (1 month ago)
And FEMA will be bringing back debtor prisons for you to work off "Your Fair Share". Which can never be done at their rate of pay minus your expenses to stay in their holding cell.
Janine Garverick (1 month ago)
Promise Notes
Janine Garverick (1 month ago)
Buying, selling and the buy backs !
Michael Agape (1 month ago)
I used to sign Without Prejudice and cited UCC, now I simply sign- For: JESUS CHRIST By: Ambassador. This is pursuant to Col. 3:17 in the Ambassador handbook ;) Using the Bible as God's Law is in agreement with man's legal system, whereas Public Law 97-280 defines the Bible as the Word of God. Peace be with you...
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
The New Jerusalem: Vatican, London, & D.C. Trinity.
Michael Agape (1 month ago)
+C Evan For following God's law? Nope. But those in rebellion get locked up as a matter of policy daily. Thanks for trolling. Peace be with you...
C Evan (1 month ago)
Michael Agape wow....do they lock you in a looney bin?
bob marks (1 month ago)
Good info to study, but wisdom suggests one takes NO action till one does a heckuva lot more investigation.
dperry1 (1 month ago)
soon they will try to force the chip in our bodies. For now it's the chip in cards probably to get the chips on folks to link all the information they have from the cars chips.
dperry1 (1 month ago)
this is why most places either do not accept personal checks anymore or bc they have duped us all to using debit and credit cards.
Monte Brodie (10 days ago)
most businesses don't accept personal checks because the checks bounce and then much time is spent by the business to recover the payment.
Who am I Really (1 month ago)
All of this appears to be based upon the Rule of Agency. The problem there is that only the government has this rule. Between private parties, or a private party and the Government, he who assumes the authority has the authority. If your friend gives you his Credit Card (or a check) to make a purchase for him, it is not considered forgery when you sign his name because you have his tacit permission. The person or store accepting that payment believes you are an Authorized agent, then the transaction is lawful. The problem with forgery and bad checks is when the owner of the account does not give permission or, in rare circumstances, changes his mind after the fact and claims that the signature was forged. In that case, the owner of the account is still liable for the purchase and the person or store accepting it is held harmless. With credit cards though, credit purchases are insured through Visa, MasterCard, etc. so the store still gets paid and the account holder might get away without being charged the amount. But that is due to a contract between the cardholder and the Credit Card Company and therefore not subject, by definition, to Tort law. Regardless of who gets paid or not, if you claim someone forged your name unlawfully you have a civil and possibly criminal case against the forger but not against the person who accepted the payment in good faith. The rest of what is said in this video, while theoretically true, it would not pass the laugh test with either a judge or a jury so you would likely lose your case for pettifogging the intent of common law, which is based largely on good faith. You might even be held in contempt if I were the presiding judge.
Nicks TaxFree (1 month ago)
Maybe you missed the main point this video was showing. Another point that was not pointed out was - as an "Authorized Signing Agent" for what you believe is your own bank account; where it's a check or a withdrawal slip - your Authorized status can be removed from you by the bank. When you deposit currency/checks into a bank, it is really theirs. Those are debt notes belonging to the Federal Reserve and the FDIC institutions are all members of the Federal Reserve System. They are just letting us use their notes to offset or transfer your liabilities, not pay off or extingush them completely. Remember, there will be no more bank bail-outs! Next time we will have bail-ins with depositors deposits. You will receive a $1 par value equity stock share for each One dollar robbed from your account, Oh sorry, your strawman's account who you were once authorized to use, but not any longer. Try selling or spending a share of worthless shares anywhere!
roger white (1 month ago)
Sign the vvords , "under duress" in your best script like its your name, that CLEARLY states you didnt vvant to nor agree vvith vvhatever you're forced to sign.
roger white (1 month ago)
+The Street I'm sorry , have never been to SD & I only learnt of it about 10yrs ago . Have you checked FaceBook? there are alot of us there ( over 1000 )
The Street (1 month ago)
I’m asking because he told me about the code twenty years or so ago
The Street (1 month ago)
roger white I once used the ucc in a court order the code meant under duress do you know what that code is? Are you the roger who owned the hostel in sd
JULI TAIT (1 month ago)
roger white I apologize for bothering you. Back in 2008 i was forced to sign a contract..I was not in agreement..actually I did state I signed under duress, the judge agreed but the opposing lawyers didn't care so they did what they had to do...screw me over.
JULI TAIT (1 month ago)
roger white What can u do if u WERE under duress and signed a document yet didn't state you were under duress at that time?
Sassy Jazzy (1 month ago)
May I have your phone number please sir
Sassy Jazzy (1 month ago)
I found you on Facebook yes
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
http://spcunversity.privatesidesolutions.com
Genene Bates (1 month ago)
LET THE BANKS GO BANKRUPT LIKE ICELAND DID.
Bray Bulahan (3 days ago)
Many of us didn't want Obummer to bail the banks out in 2008 & 2009 - but he DID and that told us whose side he was really on. The Elites. Donald Trump would NOT have signed the bank bail-outs. Soon you Trump haters will realize that he is FOR We-the-People, not for the Fed bankers bastards!!
Poison Ivy (22 days ago)
Full Metal Patriot Fed Reserve owns the USA. Our Govt filed BK in 1933, the Fed Res bought us. Our Govt became a Corporation. States are Franchises. Judges (etc) are Administrators. This is why they steal our tax dollars, no one can be held accountable. Under the Terms, the Pres (or should I say “CEO”) must issue an Emergency every year. As long as the Public favor is good, things continue. When it’s not, we become “The Enemy of the State”. We are there now. Things are going to get a lot worse Sources: 1973 Senate Report 93549 1993, Mr Traficant got it on the Record. STOPTHECRIME- NASA WAR PLANS, 5G Silent Killer, tidal waves, fires, Earthquakes, radiation bursts, Fry microwave lasers, blow up things, Trojan Horse Everything. “They” are going to eliminate a lot of us (95%). They cause 90% of nat disasters at this point, it’s documented. Aren’t even hiding it. New Orleans is a RESILIENT CITY. What does that mean? They used it as a Test/Pilot. They threw every disaster they could at it. Now it’s a police state. Ever see Minority Report? That’s N.O. They have infrared cameras all over town. Facial Recognition that can predict someone will do a crime BEFOREHAND and arrest them. Don’t believe it? Google it or look up resilient city. There will be “33” (of course). Also look up “Trump goes to Saudi Arabia & puts hands on crystal ball”. They are trying to mimic prophecy by creating things to happen as it says in last days. Even “The Red Heifer” - Science achieved that. Maybe they think People will commit suicide? Most Christians are passive, turn to the Bible and accept anything.
Full Metal Patriot (25 days ago)
If that could be a solution.. The US banks are attached to the international market now. When one major bank is threatened, they all are now...WORLDWIDE. This is the ramification of being too big too fail. The Federal Reserve System has crushed financial independence of our citizens and replaced it with reliance on the system for financial stability (if you want to call it that). The time to allow them to go bankrupt and thew citizens take ownership of their individual financial independence, would have been right before the Federal Reserve System was evert made a part of our country. The gold standard was the simplest and most beneficial financial system that ensured individual liability and independence. The government, nor any other entity could lay claim to a citizen's property or finances under that system. The burden of proof in debtor situations was strictly on the accuser and the power was balanced. Now, you see the power all resides in the accuser and none for the accused and the individual ownership of property.. really doesn't exist without lien/stipulation/interest contained. You can spend your whole life paying for land, hold the deed and when you fall into arrears on taxes (think of taxation purpose)..you lose that land and all equity involved in said property is revoked. The benefits and value of the land go to the collector and not the original procurer. If that isn't robbery...I don't know what is. But... research your local municipality.. find out how much property the municipality actually is in possession of. It may be rather surprising. Thus, when you wind this back up... you will see that when US banks go bankrupt now... the bankers do not suffer.. like a virus, they will weaken and respawn healthy and new..We as citizens, for allowing our government to sign us into the Federal Reserve System.. will be the sole victims as will other citizens in the world as their banks are leaning on our for support. It's sad.
Amy P (1 month ago)
They actually arrested them!
Scarakus (1 month ago)
Solution: Don't use Checks.
Michael Belden (1 month ago)
Not trolling. Just facts. What you are showing does not account for anyone. I will give you the facts. All researchable. All on earth and every law and Government is made by and must follow plus are Freemasons under the Queen of the UK. The all took an Oath. 1 line in the oath, you will lie to everyone or you will be put to death. 2 line. You will not lie to a Freemason or you will be put to death. In all means. All laws and Government on stands for a Freemason. Nothing on earth can follow under any of it because as their oath or the Queen states under death they have to lie to everyone. For what they are doing they can do to a Freemason all day lone. Why. They must under death tell the truth to each other. Research. Facts are facts and I love them. Thanks for your info. True laws. Life, growth and expand. Not hard.
Michael Belden (3 days ago)
+Bray Bulahan who said doing harm to a lodge? As I see with the lodges, many are closed and abandoned. My dad lodge is shut down because no one wants to join. He says nothing to me about Freemasons. I learned it from elsewhere. My dad is a 33 degree. I'm not one. He is the only one out of our family.
Bray Bulahan (3 days ago)
The rank & file members of Freemasons have no idea that those at the very top (33 degree Masons) are complicit with the cabal (Illuminati) and nowadays, even those guys aren't complicit. Back in the early days the very top level knew, but not in the modern age (after WW!). In Europe they used the organization as a way of networking for their nefarious purposes - but no one ever told the guys at the bottom that they were being used. The same as how the Fed has deceived us for a century. Blowing up Mason Lodges would accomplish nothing but get you a huge amount of karma by killing innocents.
Rebel Yell1 (1 month ago)
Michael Belden : so how about we ALL become Freemasons and infiltrate and "destroy them" at there own game! Hmmmm  lets start a movement shall we!
tony taylor (1 month ago)
Hi I saw your info on a case on subrogation. I have a case coming up and would like for you to assist me or educate me more about winning it. Its on a lawsuit about money
C. Smithey (1 month ago)
Total bull sh*t!!!!!
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
Yep!
Robert Deskins (1 month ago)
@High Frequency Radio Man you still caught up in the game man, all currency is and always been the same thing- the representation of the idea of money. Gold is not money, species money is not money and has the exact same value as any other currency: it only has the value people assign to it. A good reason for leaving the gold standard is gold is not very abundant or evenly available and it has to found and mined but for most of recorded history the only yellow-rock had going for was it was shiny and rather malleable it only recently became a useful material. Humans is & be crazy for life, all every last one but, most of them think they are sane & rational and in control and they think up strange shit and start believing it because that is part of what humans do but why is your favorite color your favorite color? Why do some people LIKE asparagus? I despise asparagus but the City of Stockton has a festival for asparagus. All in all currency is not the craziest idea of humanity
Bray Bulahan (3 days ago)
You are wrong! If the currency is backed up by gold or silver, or oil, or whatever a country's prime resource in the ground is, then that will suffice (and with no inflation).It's when the Fed started printing worthless monopoly money that would end up bringing down the system (with them filthy rich, and us as paupers). They designed this way back in the early 1940's. Read The Creature from Jeckyll Island - by G. Edward Griffin. (don't confuse with Dr Jekyll & Hyde) Jekyll Island (off the coast of Georgia) was owned by one of the big banksters and that's where they met to design when they could collapse the dollar which would cause other countries to collapse, so they could start their One World Govt - after which they planned to kill off 7/8 of the world's population.
Poison Ivy (22 days ago)
Robert Deskins Everything you say makes total sense and said so calmly without cussing or anger. I watch AIM (American Intelligence Media) he was NSA and totally knows how every aspect of Govt and Fed Reserve act/ should act. They have on many occasions described our money as “Fiat dollars”. You may already know, the real problem started when a small group of Bankers got WAY too wealthy. The Civil War crippled the US financially (purposely by the Bankers) and in 1871, our Constitution was thrown out & another used in its place. We borrowed a ton of money from The Vatican & Britain. Then the Bankers got smarter. They created the Fed Res. They pooled their resources and caused the 1929 collapse, purposely. In 1933, the USA filed BK and guess who bought it? The Federal Reserve. Under Emergency War Powers. The receiver who expedited it was the UN. At that moment, we all became their collateral. Our Pets, our jewelry, properties, EVERYTHING. That’s why we truly own nothing and why our names are in Caps on our birth certs. They own us, therefore we are their slaves? Indentured slaves. So 1933, The Constitution was suspended. Law has been abolished. Fed and State Govts are NOT real. They are privately owned Corps, doing business as “federal or state”. The Judges are privately employed Administrators called Judges. Laws are therefore Corp Regulations called statutes, codes and Ordinances. In order to maintain dictatorial control, President must declare an Emergency every year. All they “need” to continue is to have Public opinion on their side; EOs, laws and statutes can continue to be passed. Understand, that we are the enemy of the state. They use Expert programming, conditioning, prejudice and patriotism to keep us thinking we are still a country. They have sold our Industries breaking unions, raised taxes, stolen our silver and gold, our farms, stores, homes, started false wars, staged false events, poisoned our air, water and food. And they plan to kill 95% of us “useless eaters” per Ted Turner. How? Tidal waves, Earthquakes, radiation blasts, Fry microwave lasers, blow things up, 5G (cooks live things), Trojan Horse everything (RFID). Sources: 1973, Senate Doc 93549 1993, House of Rep -Mr Traficant got it on record (Author “the last minuteman”) Google STOPTHECRIME- (DEBORAH TOVARES - she has all the documents to prove it all and we are encouraged to download and use.) (YT Vids) NASA WAR PLANS SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS 5G THE BURNING OF CALIFORNIA And many more APLANETRUTH PARADISE LOST VIDS 1-52. HOW CAN WE STOP THIS???
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
+Louise Reay - So is that your professional opinion? I will allow a CPA to explain it to you. The Left is entirely Jewish. ANy idiot can do research and find it out. SO you must be beyond idiotic. Money Matrix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG5bBagq5Xw&t=441s Here is an ATTORNEY that works for their Federal Reserve. I doubt your small mind can grasp what is saying or whether you can sit through 30 minutes to educate yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5St19Ws1Opk
Louise Reay (1 month ago)
+High Frequency Radio I read the comment, and your reply. I have to say that Robert Deskins seems to have a very good grasp on the utility of money, while you are conflating economic participation in an economy with slavery while using antisemitic slurs as argument. In other words, @High Frequency Radio, you come across, not as utterly clueless on this topic, since that's a very high bar, but you are missing the reality of what money is. @Robert Deskins, Isn't it amazing how many people equate opposition to government policy in Israel with antisemitism.
Robert Deskins (1 month ago)
+High Frequency Radio  High Frequency Radio  Also I have nothing but disdain for the apartheid and oppressive activity of the state of Israel and it's Zionist politics but I have nothing against Jews in general but the reason I don't like the Zionist political movement is the reason I don't like people who call other people "Zionist Jews" because both groups are inherently racist. You really are totally caught up in the game aren't you? You're just running program man
Savior Of Noobs (1 month ago)
Signing your signature, with the intent of no liability, is fraud.
TPFLR Metals (1 month ago)
Not if you say it isn’t
AMYAS Seek Truth (1 month ago)
+Mr Shay Gordon Hall vs US
Mr Shay (1 month ago)
Uh how do you figure? That is not fraud to not agree to all the terms and if they accept it and dont see it then it's fair play just like they trick us into signing things by basically forcing us or you could say theft by deception or liability by deception because in most instances if you don't sign or agree you either cannot get the service or thing you have to get so have no choice like a license so that would be fraud or duress and anytime you sign anything you are waiting all rights, that's a fact and that is FRAUD. A signature or agreement cannot be made using trickery which is when you are not told in writing on the form all the underlying conditions of what that signature really means. So NO it is not fraud to sign a thing with no liability. Our government hates when you know your rights!
OneBlueFroggy (1 month ago)
Well, that's clear as mud !
Tracey Kays (1 month ago)
OneBlueFroggy well that’s a new one to me. Laughed out loud. Thank U and I’m gonna steal and use ur statement in the future.
(((money changers)))
Apollo Lasky (1 month ago)
what a coincidence, i downloaded cracking the code two weeks ago. Its almost like google WANTS ME TO KNOW ALL THIS INFORMATION.
TheWormzerjr (1 month ago)
go to http://reaperishere.weebly.com/under-standing-laws.html click on number 17(a)
Jakob Jones (1 month ago)
All man laws are made up, evolution proves this. Did governments exist when we were fish? Do fish have to pay taxes? What about birds? At some point some man got the "bright" idea he can con people and get them to give him shit if he just says it... and it worked! And the rest, as they say, is history!
Hey Y'all 80 (18 days ago)
Jakob Jones with Your logic he should not listen to You either. Smh
Jakob Jones (1 month ago)
+Mr Shay : Um, are you a dumb ass? Do you believe the earth is flat too? You realize that evolution has nothing to do with the big bang and the big bang is just a theory? Do you fucking realize that even if there is a god that it doesn't contradict evolution? Evolution is simply the history of the universe as we know it and the fact is that humans did evovle from fish or something similar. Who knows exactly what happens but we know that we used to be very primitive... so primitive that we didn't have a tax system, laws, cops, militaries, etc... HENCE, if your little brain can realize that, it means that all those things are MADE UP! If they didn't exist before man and they exist only in humans societies then they are made up BY HUMANS! If they are made up by humans then how the fuck do you now they made them up correctly or why they made them up in the first place! What it means is that when some military goes and kills some group of people that they are doing simply because of their psychosis... not because it has to be that way. When animals go kill something they do it because they have to... to eat, to defend themselves, or defend their territory. Humans have grown far beyond that yet we still play that game. Do we need to murder people? Do we need to incarcerate people for smoking weed or failing to pay a traffic ticket? What happens when the medicine is worse than the disease? Your are an idiot because you think you have to prove that GOD exists... yet you have no idea what that even means. I'm sorry you have been duped by science. If you believe some idiot actually knows what happened at the beginning of "time" just because he says so then no wonder..
Mr Shay (1 month ago)
If you believe evolution you have a bigger issues than laws lol. Yeah we used to be fish OK. Scientists the real ones have admitted something had to have created us or caused this big bang like GOD?
Stevie Aurum (1 month ago)
For any who know the basics of transvestigation, look at Elizabeth Magie Phillips.  She is an obvious FTM tranny.  Oh, yes, folks, they were doing it way back then and long before.
Rebel Studio (1 month ago)
What would happen if you were to sign a ticket writing out your name in all caps when you sign it? I mean. It belongs to a dead man so if the dead man happens to sign it wouldn't that mean he is then now considered alive and no longer dead?
24revealer (1 month ago)
SIgn the ticket "under duress by your autograph". You void any promise to perform for the pirates.
B.C. Schmidt (1 month ago)
Yes sir
Rebel Studio (1 month ago)
Thanks mane.
B.C. Schmidt (1 month ago)
Look into UCC 1-308 "without prejudice"
Dave Ridlespriger (1 month ago)
I'm not above the law. And never claimed so.
Janetta Schuch (1 month ago)
Can there be more what specifically to do & less what almost guarantees lack of understanderbility. I see explanations like this & feel that there was no real objective to explain
Jack Benimble (1 month ago)
I’ve stumbled into that weird part of YouTube 🤣 and to think. I started with a video about Helen smash memes.
Full Metal Patriot (25 days ago)
Me too... I went from Disney not understanding lightsabers to...
Jimmy Page (1 month ago)
I've tried and tried to explain to so many some basics of our nations monetary system and what the federal reserve bank is doing. Keep in mind i dont claim to understand more than some of the basics. I've not had any success.lol None! Is me and/or might they better understand someone else's explanation? Yes no maybe? Point is it's overwhelming. This is kinda like trying to explain to someone that there spouse has been cheating on them. When trying to explain our central banking system i see disbelief, denial and more. Complacency, some burry there head in the sand. Others believe something like this wont affect them that they have shielded themselves somehow. Some feel powerless. You can lead a horse water...............
ItchingToBeFree (14 days ago)
I couldn't have described it better! People look at you like you're speaking a foreign language. I barely bother any more. You either get it or you don't.
Charles Ivie (18 days ago)
Play some guitar!
Becki Wildeman (1 month ago)
Have you ever looked at the Date line and Signature line on a check ZOOMED IN? Isn't the Authorized Person the Banker in the upper right hand corner of the Check? And the Date is the sequence code of the Check/Name and Date of the Banker? Doesn't the Banker Authorized Signature need to fill out the whole Check in Capital letters?
Gerald's Videos (1 month ago)
SUBSCRIBED!
Noname Noslogan (1 month ago)
The big difference between Monopoly and the real world is that in the real world the bankers can print more money and just charge an interest on that and keep doing that forever until the debt and payment are unsustainable. The Fed has the M1, M2 and M3 money supplies. The people who get the "new money" when it is at its most valuable get it and get to spend it first. Everyone else gets less and less valuable money down to the average person at street level who gets the money when it is at its least valuable and pays the most amount of interest on the debt through taxes and most of the debt. But, here is something nobody knows. In the Monopoly game it says that IF the bank runs out of money the banker can "CUT UP STRIPS OF PAPER AND WRITE THE VALUE ON THEM AND USE THAT AS MONEY TO CONTINUE THE GAME UNTIL THERE IS A WINNER" Here is a challenge. Has anyone ever thought about and designed a way to play Monopoly continuously without there being a winner and no losers? Or at least multiple people, more than one, playing the game without there being a loser? It'd be interesting to see how it could be done. Everyone just gets richer and richer and keeps playing as long as they want and the bank just keeps creating more money :)
The-Toy-Guy (18 days ago)
Monopoly is not the whole game. You can buy a set of paper notes to add additional money to your game. These have always been available so technically yes the game doesn't end regardless of the instructions.
Sirius Magus (1 month ago)
Yes but in monopoly there is an element of chance by the role of the dice. In a corporatocracy and rigged system very little is left to chance .
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
But, here is something nobody knows. In the Monopoly game it says that IF the bank runs out of money the banker can "CUT UP STRIPS OF PAPER AND WRITE THE VALUE ON THEM AND USE THAT AS MONEY TO CONTINUE THE GAME UNTIL THERE IS A WINNER" Nobody knows that? All you have to do is read the instructions. I said that in one of my videos.
J P (1 month ago)
What are those little half circles at the end of "JOHN DOE" and "John Doe"?
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
+KingdomCome - Your checks do not have security features. They are cheap. The UCC is world wide.
KingdomCome (1 month ago)
+High Frequency Radio My cheques do not have this printed on them, just state security features over and over. That is up in Canada but the UCC apparently is not followed up here, but we are all under the federal reserve under the Qu een Elizabeth who has no last/surname which apparently is the joiner and the all capital straw man!
Kman (1 month ago)
AlvieC Correct. All capital writing is not a proper form of writing according to the Oxford manual of styles. Alternatively, the all capital form of writing is found in the Chicago manual of styles and recognized as sign language...A foreign language with dual meaning words. Our system uses it all the time to fool people into believing a word or groups of words or symbols have singular meaning, when they don't. One volunteers themselves to believe each word on an official document. It's all fraud from its conception to enslave the land.
AlvieC (1 month ago)
JP - The upper case stuff is an improper form of DOG-LATIN. All of it is to distract you. Why is it improper you ask? DOG-LATIN is proper, where DOG LATIN is improper. Thus, what is used, JOHN DOE, instead of JOHN-DOE. It goes back to Rome. Those little half circles are to distract you.
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
I don't know...what do you think they are? The book is in the description.
Truther Revolution (1 month ago)
Wait a minute where did he say the correct way to sign ?
knowledgeispower4u (20 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio Most of that is mumbo jumbo crap. There are 2 ways to sign. 1. In almost every instance, you will be acting as the administrator for the "legal person" you posses BY: John Doe, Sole Authorized Administrator, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2. If ever there was a need to act as an agent(at arms length) for the "legal person" you posses BY: John Doe, Agent, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
16:00
Conestoga Man (1 month ago)
Great eyeopening video. Has anyone else said that the narrator sounds a lot like Samuel L Jackson (or his authorized representative)?
Felix R Talavera (1 month ago)
Is there anyone that can help about city code enforer they keep citing none stop I thought what we have on our property is private I been researching but hit deadends I will be thankful for any advice or help Thanks
Felix R Talavera (16 days ago)
+24revealer I'm still trying to get information on when the land was bought you see this property was my mother's grandma's house and her and Grandpa bought in the early 1930's would that make a difference ? I will let you know when I get the original date, before grandma passed away in the mid 1970's , she signed the house over to my mother l live here with her. Thank you, Felix
24revealer (1 month ago)
When the property was purchased you signed a tax affidavit and that was your consent to be taxed. That is what you must understand and correct. You must revoke your signature or give them notice that you intended to qualify your signature with "without prejudice" above you autograph as registered agent as your intent was to make no promises to perform for the (state) birth certificate agency, also called a legal person or child of the state.
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
What did you research and where did you research?
Miguel Burgos (1 month ago)
At 16:00 it tells you the many ways you can sign to not be liable for anything
24revealer (1 month ago)
None of those signatures in the video take away the agents liability. You must put "without prejudice" above or before your autograph. Anything signed without prejudice can not be used in a court against you. With an automobile, there are three witnesses they use against your or three signatures, the insurance, the car registration and the driver's license. If all of these are signed without prejudice and you have copies, you take that to the court, give copies to the judge and ask the judge what evidence he is using against you, that according to the way you qualified your signature, there is no evidence before the court that you promised to perform on any contract and that you require an order to dismiss the charges with prejudice immediately. Read the book , Without Prejudice by William Dixon to help understand what is going on.
Nicole zzz (1 month ago)
Not meant to be rude, just so I'm clear on this, there's a way I can sign things and not be liable? So in a tragic ticket situation I can sign a certain way and not be legally responsible? Can someone please dumb this down for me? I almost get it, but not quite.
Julie Williams (13 days ago)
High Frequency Radi
Julie Williams (13 days ago)
Nicole zzz Ààaa
24revealer (1 month ago)
+Kman non- assumpsit works as well as without prejudice. If you are being forced to sign something, like fingerprinting, you want to sign that "under duress by: your autograph". Something most people do not understand is that a signature is your intent. So, your intent would be how you qualify your signature, such as without prejudice or under duress and the autograph shows them who's intent it was. These qualifications must always be before or above your autograph to be effective.
24revealer (1 month ago)
+Disposable Hero If you are under duress, you write that above your autograph and that voids any promise of the autographer to perform on the contract they are forcing you to sign. They are tricking you to sign a contract at common law and this starts the whole ball rolling if you fail to perform for them. If you don't sign then it is treated as an open signature, which is consent or a promise to perform.
24revealer (1 month ago)
None of those signatures in the video take away the agents liability. You must put "without prejudice" above or before your autograph. Anything signed without prejudice can not be used in a court against you. With an automobile, there are three witnesses they use against your or three signatures, the insurance, the car registration and the driver's license. If all of these are signed without prejudice and you have copies, you take that to the court, give copies to the judge and ask the judge what evidence he is using against you, that according to the way you qualified your signature, there is no evidence before the court that you promised to perform on any contract and that he is required to dismiss the charges with prejudice. Read the book , Without Prejudice by William Dixon to help understand what is going on.
Noszair Jones (1 month ago)
What about child support papers.. I see all caps and I have a first time court appearance on a few days.. Any ideas
SK1016 1.4.18 B360 (16 days ago)
its not about being a toe-rag-Dad its about consenting to a contract that "Steals" $500.00 of the $1,000.00 that you should be allowed to send your Flesh. if DCF or family services was truthfully here for the children they would be A non profit organization, but their not. instead of you people soliciting your selfish opinions one month ago somebody probably could've helped Noszair Jones, but im sure its too late now... Further more, here I am in the same spot with the same papers at my door and I have 20 days to reply or somethings supposed to happen. I want to send my kid money, but I Do Not want to pay for those nasty lonely bitches to be employed at the DCF office. I thought I knew how to sign but apparently I was misinformed can somebody look out?
SK1016 1.4.18 B360 (16 days ago)
@+Mbolo Nmvoy its not about being a toe-rag-Dad its about consenting to a contract that "Steals" $500.00 of the $1,000.00 that you should be allowed to send your Flesh. if DCF or family services was truthfully here for the children they would be A non profit organization, but their not. instead of you people soliciting your selfish opinions one month ago somebody probably could've helped Noszair Jones, but im sure its too late now... Further more, here I am in the same spot with the same papers at my door and I have 20 days to reply or somethings supposed to happen. I want to send my kid money, but I Do Not want to pay for those nasty lonely bitches to be employed at the DCF office. I thought I knew how to sign but apparently I was misinformed can somebody look out?
Amelia Roque (1 month ago)
Kman - does that work for you, because . . .
Kyle O. Buckner (1 month ago)
deceptionstoppers.com
Merwyck (1 month ago)
+Mbolo Nmvoy, why do you disparage the person asking the question? One can support their children without consenting to a court ordered amount. Until you've been named in such an order where the terms are grossly unfair, don't -equivocate- _conflate_ the notion of 'support' with the notion of 'complying with a support order'.
Michael Doster (1 month ago)
Thanks... Technical, pain in the ass, but very useful. Thanks! Always thought "indorsement" was spelled endorsement...??? Clarification???
Mbolo Nmvoy (1 month ago)
Even though a lot of my work boiled down to questions of finance and documents I only ever "endorsed" any financial instrument. If the question gnaws away at your peace of mind any competent and sincere adviser, online or in real life, will be happy to explain the difference. Just remember that much online advice is given by people with no more knowledge than yourself. My understanding is that an endorsement that identifies an endorsee has the same effects as an indorsement. An imprecise endorsement is potentially dangerous as it could make the financial instrument on which it is written payable to whoever takes it to pay it into their bank account. Only endorse a financial instrument when you are in the process of paying it into your bank account, unless, as before, you clearly identify the beneficiary of your endorsement. That beneficiary is automatically and almost completely irreversibly the person you named as endorsee. When I pay cheques into my bank account I endorse them as payable to "my name and account number", at "bank's name and sort code number". I never lost a single penny doing that. That does not mean that no-one will ever lose out. (And I am often told I am being over-cautious.) Indorsement by members of the general public is usually the useless product of some cunning stunt. Best ask the teller when you next pay in any financial instrument to your account, or to a third party's. Likely that teller will only advise the use of "endorsement". For either "endorsement" or "indorsement", once the teller has stamped and signed the paying-in slip the only fraud of which you could become a victim is perpetrated by the person who gave you the financial instrument, as part of a mildly competent fraud or as the consequence of your payer's account being insufficiently funded. The chances and results of an endorsed document or an indorsed document turning out to be worthless are identical. Conclusion: For any question about finance, it's best to ask a living, breathing professional if the question is of more than academic interest to you.
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
Please either Google it or check the comments. You are incorrect.
Opulent Odyssey (1 month ago)
Can someone dumb this down for me & give me basics... Like just tell me how to sign from now on ????
Kman (1 month ago)
Opulent Odyssey if and only you truly are under duress. Someone threatens you, "if you don't sign I'm going to have to arrest you". One could also ask the "officer", "is that an order?" Most likely they will state "yes". To which you sign UDC (under duress and coercion). Then send them a bill of particulars for fulfilling Order. "Authorized Representative" for use of all other type of contracts.
Armed Archangel (1 month ago)
"Absent assumption of value" is what you write before you sign and make sure your name is next to that.
Opulent Odyssey (1 month ago)
So if I was Jane doe ... I'd write my signature as Jane Doe Under Duress
John Schiff (1 month ago)
Add the words "under duress" after your signature. This voids the contract and gives you a legal defense to get out of tickets.
LogicianTenderstone (2 months ago)
I suggest signing documents as "I. D. Cline" ....
Michael Doster (1 month ago)
Funny...
ytrebiLeurT (2 months ago)
I don´t sign anything...
ytrebiLeurT (1 month ago)
+Armed Archangel Of course, I understand what you are saying, but why would anyone ask me for a signature or my ID card that I do not have? What could they do? Murder me because I do not sign anything that is useless for me? Shoot me on the moon? If they give me a lot of money for my signature, well, I'll sign everything. In addition ... I do not have a car ;)
Armed Archangel (1 month ago)
+ytrebiLeurT yes, this is true, I have not denied you of that fact but the moral to my comment if you did not notice was that if you do not sign a traffic violation, they will take you to jail so you can see a judge regardless what your beliefs are, go ahead and try it and tell me how it works out for you.
ytrebiLeurT (1 month ago)
+Armed Archangel Nope, nobody can force you to sign anything... Not to sign is no crime
Armed Archangel (1 month ago)
Lol, That is a nice and sure way to spend a couple of days in jail.
Michael Doster (1 month ago)
Not even tickets??? Jailtime....
POLLARDMANIA (2 months ago)
There is NO SUCH THING AS "SOVERIEGN CITIZENS" that means you are including yourself as a citizen in the system your trying to state that you are not part of ....you are "SOVEREIGN" NOT A CITIZEN!!!
Alia Jacta Est (20 days ago)
+Disposable Hero No, it is your straw man. The state creates a corporate legal personality that just happens to have the same name as you. The state then uses this as collateral (it is awarded a value commensurate with the anticipated lifetime productivity of the flesh and blood person) via the bond market. You will notice that your birth certificate will state that it is not to be used as a means of identification, yet getting a driver's licence or passport requires you to submit your birth certificate as part of your application. They are creating joinder between you and the state's straw man it created in your likeness. You agree to take on the liabilities of the piece of paper. Taxes, fines, utility bills and just about everything else that will, at some point, result in a brown envelope landing on your door mat demanding money will have your name written on it in capitals. This is not addressed to you. It is addressed to your birth certificate. Whether you consent or not is irrelevant as you will also have your NI/SS number, proving that your physical self is a government employee. Just like you have rules to obey at your place of work, you have to obey the rules of your principle employer; the state. The state decrees that you meet the liabilities of your straw man. Say "Citizen", mean "Employee".
Joe Bloggs (20 days ago)
+Alia Jacta Est What happens if one writes to the state and ask that the state acknowledges their claim?
Alia Jacta Est (1 month ago)
+Disposable Hero No. Your birth (Berthing) certificate is a bill of lading and your corporate alter-ego or straw man (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME7K6P7hlko). This "person" is the property of the state which created it. It is this "person" which creates the liabilities you take responsibility for. Your "person" will be issued with a NI/SS card shortly before leaving mandatory indoctrination as it deemed to have become financially active at this point. This is the double entrapment, in that your "person" is not only the property of the state, it is also its employee. The birth certificate is proof of ownership (by the state) and the NI/SS number is your certificate/record of employment. By using either, you agree to be bound by the owner's/employer's rules. A citizen is merely an employee. In emigrating, you are simply transferring ownership of the "person" from one master to another.
Disposable Hero (1 month ago)
+Mbolo Nmvoy What do you mean by "heading off to punitive detention will need to become a generous flow"? Are you suggesting putting these people in cages?
Disposable Hero (1 month ago)
+Alia Jacta Est Are you saying a birth certificate is evidence of citizens?
Sephanyahu Blake (2 months ago)
When might a person practically benefit from using this knowledge? What signing situations might be later eluded?
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
+Baddest Bees - IF YOU NEED A JOB (SLAVE) THEN YOU PROBABLY SHOULD NOT BE USING THIS. IT IS NOT FOR SLAVES. AN EMPLOYER DOES NOT HAVE TO HIRE YOU UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
Baddest Bees (1 month ago)
This is all cool BUT IN THE "REAL" WORLD THEY WON'T ACCEPT IT AT LEAST NOT FOR A JOB I WITNESSED GUY NOT GET HIRED OVER THIS EXACT THING HE WROTE SOMETHING AND ADDED "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" SAID HE WASN'T A SLAVE", THEY SAID DON'T LOSE UR MONEY OVER THIS SIGN IT NORMAL ..HE ENDED UP HAVING TO LEAVE
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
​+isblazed - Cracking the code the book is in the description. You can download it, read the entire thing, then if you have any question you can pay me for a consultation. The answers are in the book. Pick it up and read it and stop being lazy. No one is going to hold your hand or feel sorry for your ass. This is life.
isblazed (1 month ago)
+High Frequency Radio so far at least three people are interested in an answer in the same spirit of sharing that you posted this video can you answer the question? maybe its in the vid which I am still watching, Would you point to the timestamp? tia... learning.
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
+Michael Doster I dont think so.
TheSpaceCoyote82 (2 months ago)
Ah. The good ol' Landlord's game.
David Billings (2 months ago)
The lower courts do not have to follow supreme Court decisions unless in in the lower courts favor. Non the less a lot of valuable information is in this case.
Dave M (2 months ago)
i’ve played the landlord game. yes, essentially monopoly...
David Billings (2 months ago)
I don't care about the right to travel cause anymore because they lie in court rooms and the right to travel was only the first wave of attack on a corrupt system. The real battle starts soon and it is rfid shoved in your skin. I fly under the radar and wait for it. Three square market is the pilot hole for the bigger hole to be drilled. All you got to do is wait. Going into court is playing their game.
David Billings (1 month ago)
+High Frequency Radio the video was in my estimation how not to present a case. Then again I think it won't matter anyway. I was going for a jury trail because I felt my chances to win might be based upon my belief that I have a right to travel and maybe the jury would decide on my behalf. I was going to be a part of the picking of the jury. It didn't go that far because the court didn't follow their own laws. They know it's a fiction. Good luck to all that try. Bigger battle ahead for me and thousands.
High Frequency Radio (1 month ago)
WTF does this video have to do with RIght to Travel?
Loader7272 (2 months ago)
9:29 --- 'a paper attached' -- is an allonge. Very important. Please research. https://livinglies.wordpress.com/2012/06/04/allonges-assignments-and-endorsements-the-real-deal/
ed nadeau (2 months ago)
How can a typical classic idiot citizen (like me) ever get its head around these facts , ideas ? Can a farmer mentality or artist or car mechanic have to become a lawyer mentality? It reminds me of the right /left brain thing, Lawyers understand this.The FED understands this. "This" = its easier for the lawyer to "understand " farming than it is for the farmer to grasp complex (?) concepts about the laws . bla bla ...................
The-Toy-Guy (18 days ago)
Learn how to reverse speech. Immunity exists between State and Commonwealth governments from each other's laws always. So it's simply a matter of learning what the reverse of an allegation is. If someone is claiming there is only 'one' option there never is. There are always two and if you do not possess an ability to rationalize between the two you will be manipulated by people who want things their way not the way things actually are.
Kman (1 month ago)
ed nadeau You simply are just a man. There are all sorts of societies out there. You are not part of the legal society and most likely not part of the space alien society either. You did not create it, so how are you a part of it or being held liable to a society you have no standing under. Only by the power of the sword (or gun). Because i have created these symbols you are looking at right now, they come as some sort of measurement of understanding but, you did not create them so, you know not the meaning. How does a court order the appearance of a squirrel? A cow? A dog? They do not understand, so how can they be held liable? "They" (the legal society) power over you by you volunteering your consent. The Declaration of Independence states, "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed... Do not give them consent. Get it now?
David Billings (2 months ago)
I recommend that if you don't have a lot of backing and people to go with you, just pay. The battle has just begun. It is no longer about your right to travel. The courts are on to this and once you go to court, your theirs or your strawman. The battle coming up is biochipping. Rfid. But if you feel you must fight the military courts the first thing you must say at the entryway is you do not consent. The stenographer must be in the room at all times. Get on the internet and get motions to dismiss on lack of evidence. There must be a damaged party or property or else it is just statutory laws. Don't waste the time with the jurisdiction issue. When they ask if you are guilty or not guilty just say you want a jury trial. If you are lucky to get that far they will stack the jury with agents. Believe me the real battle is yet to come but is close now.
Joe Bloggs (19 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio There are no pending court actions against me. My question was hypothetical, and I hoped that there might be someone who had experienced response from a court.   Going by the negative responses (none reply) from J.P. Morgan bankers. Their action is evasive with a purpose that suggests that J.P. Morgan knows the answer null & voids the contract with me hence their deliberate none action. Nothing good as ever come from PC. Bullies thrive corruption hides, and the perpetrators squeal every time they're exposed. While positive, healthy thoughts are suppressed.  About a response from a court to my question.  The court's legal position must be the same as J.P. Morgan. But a court cannot be seen to lose publically. So their reply may be one of intimidations and coercion. The so-called justice system is performed by bureaucrats and cowards, so conceivably the prosecutor would dismiss. Knowing full well that their deceitful industry would be brought to light if they are to declare the proprietor of the corporate name.
High Frequency Radio (20 days ago)
+Joe Bloggs - Write them and come back and tell us what they said...
Joe Bloggs (20 days ago)
+High Frequency Radio What happens if one writes to the court and ask that they acknowledge who owns the corporate name? My own private dealing with J.P.Morgan bank when they are asked to acknowledge who owns the 'NAME used to identify in order to enter a contract with them they go quiet and refuse to answer with a direct answer.
High Frequency Radio (2 months ago)
The courts have been on to this since day one. You are the one just finding out about it. People have been battling the courts for the last 30 years with this information. People do win. The people who lose are the ones who do not study and do not internalize the information. YOU NEVER ASK FOR A JURY TRIAL. YOU TELL THEM YOU ARE NOT DISPUTING THE FACTS THUS PREVENTING A JURY TRIAL. THIS IS THE WORST ADVICE ANYONE COULD TELL ANYONE. NO ONE WINS IN A JURY TRIAL. THEY HAVE A 98 PERCENT CONVICTION RATE.
Charles Hopkins (2 months ago)
Question: do I have to file any documents with the county clerk? Will they not attack me and say that I'm some sort of a hybrid if I don't discount all signatures on other documents before I start doing this? Simply because I have a personal checking account doesn't mean that I can start doing this correct? What are all the steps that I must take for this not to come back on me?
Charles Hopkins (2 months ago)
Yes but when you're signing a check it has to be unambiguous so the fact that you have to use a magnifying glass makes authorized representative printed on the check ambiguous. Put agent anyway
Kman (1 month ago)
isblazed a user or YT may have deleted an account erasing any message.
isblazed (1 month ago)
is there a reply deleted here?
Noisy Majority (2 months ago)
Thank you Yusef !
Theodore Freeman (2 months ago)
99.9 percent of all house foreclosures are illegal. All loan are insured after 90 days in default the insurance company pays the lean holder off for the house. The mortgage company was payed they no longer own the house the insurance company dose but yet they illegally start foreclosure on property they do not own. The insurance company payed it off but they try a force you out of a house they have been payed for and steal it to resale and if the bill of sell and the the loan paper are seperated the make the loan null and void these two papers have to stay together and never do because most loans on home are sod many times.
Theodore Freeman (2 months ago)
+Debonair Das CFLA certified forensic loan auditors and Mortgage compliance investigator/ Forensic & bloomberg Audits ETC...
Debonair Das (2 months ago)
can you share your sources please. I really wanna read and know more
jimmyfly (2 months ago)
The only way to avoid liability is to not sign.
txflyguy40 (18 days ago)
+The-Toy-Guy The way it works here in Texas is If you don't plea the judge makes a plea for you of Not guilty trial by jury. Then they use the U.S mail to send you a date of the court hearing. it is not a manditory summons. it is a cour to sea or courtesy letter. Then when you don't show up in court the judge signs a warrant for your arrest. they never tell you of the warrant. You find out about the warrant when they arrest you for failure to appear and you will spend 6 month's in jail unless you bail. The system is a complete fraud.
The-Toy-Guy (18 days ago)
What you are forgetting is they can not 'force' you to appear in a courtroom. Your reasoning for not attending a courtroom is also taken into consideration. If you want to screw them like they are screwing you always plan to plea guilty. But before you do call in sick to your court hearing, when it's rescheduled to it again. And again and again and so on. To prove you do not have the means or ability to get to the courtroom itself is very easy - just disconnect your car battery and take it to a mechanic or get a doctors sick certificate. Any form of proof does the trick. Do this over and over until you eventually do not get a summons to return. Problem solved. They can NOT force you to go to a courtroom it's that simple.
txflyguy40 (1 month ago)
If you don't sign the ticket they tell you they will take you to jail. If you claim duress they will proceed and force a plea of not guilty trial by jury. At that time if you do not show up they will force a failure to appear and at that time they will arrest you and you go to jail. they force a bond on you or you stay in jail till you get another court date for failure to appear. Anyway you slice it they will force their fraud on you.
danny donaldson (2 months ago)
Just scratch your name
Christopher Masters (2 months ago)
I may not look pretty, but, I'm rouge.
Jesus Maldonado (2 months ago)
I want to start from the very beginning
Jesus Maldonado (2 months ago)
How do I start learning from the beginning? Any one where I can start? Just tell me where to start and I'll take it from there I am aware and am seeking to know more. Please any suggestions?
The-Toy-Guy (18 days ago)
No simply no David. Do not enter a court. Never enter a courtroom if you have a choice. They can not force you to be there. If you want to screw them like they are screwing you always plan to plea guilty if you are guilty. But before you do call and say you can't make your court hearing, when it's rescheduled to it again. And again and again and so on. To prove you do not have the means or ability to get to the courtroom itself is very easy - just disconnect your car battery and take it to a mechanic or get a doctors sick certificate. Any form of proof does the trick. Do this over and over until you eventually do not get a summons to return. Problem solved. They can NOT force you to go to a courtroom it's that simple.
David Billings (2 months ago)
Start by entering the court and say, sir let the record show that I do not consent and waive the benefits. Then you proceed. He will read the charges and ask how you plea. My response would be, Under the common law I would like to see my accuser. Then I would say, under the common law there must be a damaged party or some damaged property. As I have not damaged any person or property then there must not be any case against this flesh and blood living person. Then see where it goes from there. I do not recommend going to court over the drivers license but if you do stick with the damaged party line. Once again there must be a damaged party to proceed. Go to some old Patriot sites and find legal documents on motion to dismiss on lack of evidence. The first and foremost thing is to be respectful and don't let them see you sweat. They will not be respectful to you but that is there way of keeping you off balance. It's not enough to know your side, you must understand their procedures. The best weapon you have is the common law and you should study it. You need an advisor but can't be on the bar.
Christopher Masters (2 months ago)
All under the table
Christopher Masters (2 months ago)
Live out in the middle of BFGeorgia. Not a neighbor around for miles. Forest. Property owner let's me stay here for maintaining his lands. And seeing to that others quit stealing his farm eqpt and stuff.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.